<aside> ⚠️ Light spoilers

</aside>

I picked up Snow Crash in an attempt to better understand the metaverse (a term which Stephenson coined!). Metaverse is in vogue right now, in no small part due to Mark Zuckerberg, and I think sci-fi is a good source of speculation for potential future paths.

That said, the most interesting aspect of the book was not the metaverse stuff, but rather the discussion of mind viruses.

One of the key plot ideas is “neurolinguistic hacking” – the idea that we have deep neural circuits in our brains (inaccessible to our higher cognition) that can be “hacked” with the right stimulus. This thread about the programmability of the human mind – and thus the vulnerability of the human mind to “mind viruses” was utterly fascinating. It is masterfully weaved with Sumerian mythology and ancient history: in Stephenson’s semi-fictional view, the story of the Tower of Babel (in which the Lord caused everyone to speak different languages) could have been the product of a “mind virus”. It’s hard to know how much of this is pure fiction, as opposed to genuine left-field speculation on historical events, but in either case, it is absolutely delightful – feels vaguely similar to the mysterious and conspiratorial reinterpretations of the historical evidence that constitute the only redeeming feature of Dan Brown novels (see e.g The Da Vinci Code).

A core theme of Snow Crash is that the metaverse can affect reality – a mind virus caught in the metaverse can cause the operating system of the brain to crash. While perhaps too fanciful, this is certainly more applicable than ever: arguably social media companies, having poured vast sums of money into psychological research, have already figured out how to hack into our subconscious. It’s scary to think about what they could achieve if they controlled ever more sensory input.

While the ideas in Snow Crash are intricate and fascinating, the novel is pretty bizarre. There are several story arcs that are just weird and out-of-place (e.g the affair between the 15yo protagonist and one of the main antagonists); the world-building feels clumsy at times (it is as confusing as that of Neuromancer without creating a vibe in the same way); the exposition of the ideas is very forced – Hiro converses with a digital librarian to figure everything out – though it’s strange for me to fault that because these library scenes were my favourite parts of the book. So it’s worth a read, but only if you’re interested in the funky neurolinguistic hacking concepts.


Key ideas

<aside> ⚠️ Heavy spoilers below

</aside>

The core argument of the book is rather intricate. I have done my best to sketch it out below. As I mention in the review above, I don’t know if there’s any validity to these ideas, but they are very interesting nonetheless!


Highlights